Young Lawyers’ Council: An Attempt of Legal Self-Organization or a Tool of State Propaganda?

Published on October 25, 2024
Currently, official channels and the website of the Belarusian bar exclusively promote state-driven narratives. Although attorneys should be active participants in the judiciary, they are engaging in state propaganda, showing no alternative stance on human rights violations in the country or the continuous restrictions on lawyers' professional rights. One of the most visible contributors to this agenda is the Young Lawyers’ Council under the Belarusian Republican Bar Association (BRBA).

Typically, divisions within any structure signify independent self-organisation, similar to how ants split into castes ensuring survival, or birds divide into in V-formations. In states, such division manifests as separate branches of government. These phenomena reflect autonomous organisation where each entity or actor follows simple rules without external control.

Yet, can we describe certain structural divisions within the Belarusian advocacy, such as the Young Lawyers’ Council (YLC) at the BRBA, as independent decision-makers if the Belarusian legal community can no longer operate autonomously as an institution? This article examines the Council’s activities and why young lawyers play a crucial role in Belarusian state policy.
YLC in theory
The Young Lawyers’ Council at BRBA is theoretically focused on defending members' rights, educational opportunities, and investigating professional challenges.
Its official aims are:
  • Representing young attorneys’ interests within management bodies of the Belarusian Republican Bar and regional bar associations;
  • Supporting young attorneys’ professional training and development;
  • Organising scientific and practical conferences, seminars, and roundtables for young lawyers, assistants, and trainees;
  • Encouraging youth initiatives;
  • Developing proposals and incentives to encourage young attorneys, fostering conditions for their professional growth and increased social engagement;
  • Conducting scientific and practical research on issues related to the legal profession;
  • Preparing proposals on matters related to attorneys' professional activities and education;
  • Assisting with the publication of materials drafted by young attorneys;
  • Supporting the preservation and development of legal traditions and maintaining high moral and ethical standards within the legal profession;
  • Establishing contacts and fostering cooperation with similar organisations of young attorneys in foreign countries;
  • Promoting cultural, recreational, and sports activities;
  • Increasing recognition in the community and building a “client base”;
  • Organising and conducting other events for young attorneys that comply with laws on the legal profession and attorney activities.
It is clear that the initial aims of this organisation were to protect young attorneys from pressure from state bodies and the leadership of attorney self-governing bodies, and to create conditions for the education of young attorneys. In reality, however, the YLC is currently engaged in activities not stated in the organisation’s objectives. Participation in propaganda television programmes, projects promoting illegitimate amendments to the legislation, and fostering an atmosphere of citizen powerlessness before the state have all been observed in the actions of YLC and its leadership. More on the actual function of the Council is provided in the following section of this article.
Why YLC should not be underestimated
YLC leaders have repeatedly become the face of the bar, promoting a pro-government stance in the public sphere.
In the photo are Alexey Shvakov, Chair of the Belarusian Republican Bar Association, his deputy Vitaly Demidovich, and the Chair of the Young Lawyers’ Council, Olga Kalina, wearing T-shirts in support of A.G. Lukashenko.
As a result of the extensive pressure exerted on attorneys by the state since autumn 2020, along with legislative changes, by the end of 2021, territorial bar associations and the overarching Belarusian Republican Bar Association had lost the few remaining elements of independence, becoming structures entirely dependent on the Ministry of Justice. Under these conditions, the leadership’s activities in recent years have not focused on representing and protecting the rights of attorneys but instead on demonstrating loyalty to the current regime and performing an ideological role. During preparations for the widely criticised 2024 “elections” in Belarus, attorneys visited schools, universities, and workplaces, contributing to narratives that served the state’s interests.

For instance, during this period, the YLC launched a project on its Telegram channel, which was an informational campaign about accountability for “extremist crimes” during the election campaign (note that in modern Belarus, “extremist crimes” include voters expressing positions that differ from the “officially accepted” one), the duty to vote (emphasising it as an obligation rather than a right), and the need to comply with illegitimate election laws, which include various restrictions imposed to limit citizens’ voting rights (such as the absence of privacy curtains in voting booths, a ban on photographing ballots, and “pressuring” members of the electoral commission engaged in vote-rigging).
YLC leaders have repeatedly served as the “face” of the bar, projecting a stance that aligns with state structures and further establishes the erosion of the legal profession’s independence and its increasing subordination to government actors. For example, in February 2022, amid the revocation of licences and repression of attorneys defending citizens in “political” cases, then-YLC Chair Anton Grinevich signed, on behalf of the BRKA, a cooperation agreement with the Belarusian Republican Youth Union, a “youth” organisation whose membership is enforced through coercion and intimidation of schoolchildren and students. The current YLC Chair, Olga Kalina, signed a cooperation agreement in April 2024 with the Youth Parliament, another organisation that promotes anti-democratic values of the Belarusian state. “The events after the 2020 elections showed that young people are apolitical.” When signing the agreement, the BRBA YLC Chair noted that the timing of the agreement, just before “such an important political event as the first session of the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly,” was symbolic. “The cooperation will also focus on promoting patriotism and love for the Motherland”. Kalina made no mention of the fact that the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly is illegitimate and that its constitutional status was established through a referendum marred by numerous violations of voters’ rights, as documented by experts and the international community.
1. A social media post by the BRBA YLC quotes A.G. Lukashenko for “National Unity Day,” a holiday established by the state following the largest protests against the 2020 election fraud. The aftermath of these protests includes over a thousand political prisoners, 141 attorneys stripped of their licences, and more than 10 attorneys persecuted for their professional activities.

2. Alexander Ryzhkov, Chair of the Mogilev Regional Bar Association’s Young Lawyers’ Council, and Deputy Chair Olga Rusakova wearing T-shirts in support of A.G. Lukashenko.

3. Vera Oreshko, Chair of the Minsk City Bar Association, Deputy Chair Alexey Pribylskiy, and Dmitry Pronevich, Chair of the Young Lawyers’ Council of the Minsk City Bar Association, wearing T-shirts in support of A.G. Lukashenko.

4. Veronika Leychonok, Chair of the Grodno Regional Bar Association’s Young Lawyers’ Council, wearing a T-shirt in support of A.G. Lukashenko.

5. Alexey Shvakov, Chair of the BRBA, his deputy Vitaly Demidovich, and Olga Kalina, Chair of the Young Lawyers’ Council, wearing T-shirts in support of A.G. Lukashenko.
Youth Indoctrination
The manipulation of consciousness for the purposes of control, submission, and ideological shaping. The Hitler Youth.
Adolf Hitler, Manfred Seifert: Kulturarbeit im Reichsarbeitsdienst. Стр. 173
https://books.google.ru/books?id=UuYOR22sOq8C&lpg=PP1&ots=G3Hj5YWUH0&dq=Kulturarbeit%20im%20Reichsarbeitsdienst&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false
The use of youth by authoritarian regimes for their own purposes is not a new phenomenon. Young people are seen as a particularly important audience for spreading the ideas of systems seeking to expand their influence. The term for the manipulation of consciousness aimed at control, submission, and ideological shaping is "indoctrination" (from the Latin "doctrina"). The negative connotation of the term became especially apparent in the context of totalitarian regimes and propaganda, such as communism, fascism, and Nazism. In these systems, control over consciousness and manipulation of public opinion, particularly through the upbringing of youth, took on special importance. Since then, the word has been associated with processes in which individuals are manipulated to create an obedient and controllable society. The goal of indoctrination is to instil in the younger generation a certain mindset that aligns with the interests of those who control the indoctrination process. This process can occur through various social institutions, including education, media, state programmes, family and societal traditions, religious organisations, the legal profession, and more.

The most vivid example of youth indoctrination is the activities of the Hitler Youth and the Band of German Maidens, which were key tools for the Nazis to influence the worldview and behaviour of German youth during Hitler's rule in Germany. These structures were intended to project an image of unity and support for the Nazi regime among young people. "These boys and girls enter our organisations at the age of ten, often getting their first breath of fresh air there; after four years, they move from the Jungvolk to the Hitler Youth, where they stay for another four years... And if they still haven’t become perfect National Socialists, they’ll be drafted into the Labour Service and polished for another six to seven months... And whatever remains of class consciousness or social status... the Wehrmacht will take care of."

Official representatives of the Belarusian bar have frequently emphasised the importance of actively engaging with young lawyers and youth in general. "When we say we should give way to the young, it should be done genuinely, not just formally. We must trust the young more and, of course, sometimes hold them to higher standards. But there’s no need to hover over them," remarked BRBA Chair Viktor Chaichits when signing a cooperation agreement with the Belarusian Republican Youth Union. "The BRBA fully trusts the Young Lawyers’ Council to build a dialogue with the Belarusian Republican Youth Union and Belarusian youth. We should be their support in this and avoid stifling their initiative".

In October 2023, a conference of attorneys from Belarus and Russia took place. During her welcoming remarks, Svetlana Volodina, President of the Russian Federal Chamber of Lawyers, highlighted the young attorneys of Russia and Belarus. “We are proud of you, and we are here not just to lead you. You should be at the forefront, knowing that you can turn your back to us. We will always support and protect you,” she emphasised. The day before, on 5 October, young attorneys from Belarus and Russia met at a dialogue platform in the National Library in Minsk. According to N. Starovoitov, “true patriots of their countries, who love their homeland and will do everything possible for its prosperity,” gathered in the hall. As noted, patriotic education of young people was the main focus. The First Secretary of the Belarusian Republican Youth Union Central Committee, Alexander Lukyanov, was also present at the meeting and remarked, “In recent years, cooperation with the Belarusian Republican Youth Union has strengthened in terms of training specialists and fostering their patriotic spirit.” Among the topics discussed by attorneys was, of course, “work on preventing violations related to the use of prohibited symbols and collaborationism”. It raises the rhetorical question of how such an attorney would later defend a client accused under the mentioned grounds. Perhaps the day is not far off when an attorney, having embraced the ideology of combatting certain types of offences, will themselves participate in identifying and accusing such “undesirable elements”.

Recently, the involvement of young attorneys in various state-sponsored activities has been increasingly emphasised, with their role in implementing state ideology now clearly overshadowing the original goal of “representing and protecting the rights and interests of young attorneys in the governing bodies of territorial and the Belarusian Republican Bar Associations, and organising professional development,” among other aims.
Notably, on 3 October, at a meeting of the Council of the Belarusian Republican Bar Association, Olga Kalina was unanimously re-elected as Chair of the Young Lawyers’ Council for a term of two years. “Under Olga Leonidovna’s leadership over the past two years, the BRBA YLC has successfully implemented more than 10 national legal and patriotic projects, created and maintained social media networks, held the Young Lawyers’ Forum and public speaking competitions, strengthened cooperation with youth organisations in state bodies, engaged in international cooperation, signed cooperation agreements, and more. During her tenure in the BRBA YLC, Olga Leonidovna has received commendations from the Ministry of Justice, the Youth Parliament, the Belarusian Republican Youth Union Central Committee, the Standing Commission of the House of Representatives on National Security, and others. “I would like to thank the leadership and the country for the opportunities given to young attorneys in realising state youth policy. Ahead lies the second national forum of young attorneys, an election campaign in which young attorneys will certainly take an active role. I can confidently say that young attorneys are proud to be both attorneys and patriots of their country,” Kalina noted.
Briefly on why we consider it to be a problem
It’s hard to imagine an attorney speaking today about “combating extremism” without considering international human rights standards, and then tomorrow effectively defending someone accused of sharing a five-year-old "extremist" repost.
One might think that young people are simply building their careers within the conditions set by the state, and so let them; however, the impact on the very right to a defence is alarming:
  • A division in the minds of attorneys emerges between “acceptable” and “unacceptable” clients. Some can be defended, as crime is seen as a natural part of society, and nobody denounces embezzlers or bribe-takers from the attorney podium. Others, however, are viewed as enemies even by the legal profession if they oppose the current government's version of “patriotism” or the “state interest” (who exactly defines what counts as a state interest, and what doesn’t?).
  • Attorneys are subjected to indoctrination, even those not initially inclined to differentiate between “class-aligned” and “class-distant” clients. Young attorneys are denied the chance to witness the true principles of advocacy — independence and freedom of thought — learning from day one the clear message: your client is the state, act as the state wants, or you will face problems.
  • Attorneys cease to be defenders of rights and freedoms. If almost all educational events focus on citizens’ responsibilities and obligations, without mentioning rights and freedoms, this helps the state continue to narrow the field of rights without any opposition. Attorneys are the last allies for society and individuals in defending rights and freedoms, expanding the field of rights, and limiting state arbitrariness. If the legal profession abandons this role and begins “playing” for the other side, society is left without allies at all (and we can’t speak about an independent judiciary for 30 years already).
  • This perpetuates a “chilling effect” on attorneys, so they understand without direct orders what is state-sanctioned (defending state narratives and interests) and what is not (defending political prisoners, independent assessments of Belarusian legislation, resisting repression, etc.).
This all has a profoundly negative impact on the very existence of the right to defence, which becomes effectively unavailable for vast groups of Belarusians. It is difficult to imagine how an attorney can speak today about combating “extremism” without any regard for international human rights standards and then tomorrow defend someone accused of sharing a five-year-old repost. Promoting narratives of the state’s arbitrary use of its unlimited power to pass any prohibitive legislation also fails to foster independent thinking among attorneys.
Conclusions
As seen from this brief overview of the activities of the Young Lawyers’ Council in Belarus, the YLC’s actions “mirror” the activities and directives of the Bar Association: projects are launched to explain illegitimate legislation to schoolchildren and students, young attorneys participate in joint meetings with Russia and with “youth” organisations focused on the ideological shaping of Belarusian youth. Meanwhile, the goals outlined in its charter are forgotten. For example, the YLC’s social media contains no news indicating a commitment to protect its members from excessive influence by the Ministry of Justice and the Bar Association itself. As can be seen in the second article in this series on young attorneys in neighbouring countries, some associations (for example, in Georgia) periodically file lawsuits or support their colleagues in legal battles regarding an attorney’s professional reputation. From 2020 to 2024, no such initiatives were seen from the BRBA YLC, despite the fact that many young specialists are among those unlawfully stripped of their licences.

Historically, young people everywhere have driven reforms and innovation, bringing dynamism to organisations and promoting a modern approach. In the case of young people in the legal profession, one would expect them to champion a contemporary approach to human rights, assert their independence, and be constructively “revolutionary” and innovative in their methods with clients, courts, and colleagues. One might expect that the “rebelliousness” typical of young people would take on a positive connotation for attorneys, showing up in the effective and active defence of the association’s interests, clients, and the profession as a whole. However, unfortunately, none of these qualities can be observed in the BRBA YLC’s rather passive and nominal existence.

In the next article, we will explore whether signs of initiative and social engagement can be seen in similar young lawyer organisations in Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Moldova, and Russia — and consider which successful practices could serve as models for building an effective “young attorneys” group within the profession.

By clicking on the button, you consent to the processing of personal data and agree to the privacy policy, as well as consent to sending you messages by e-mail.

Made on
Tilda